Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±¸¼ø±¸°³¿­°ú °ü·ÃµÈ »ó¾Ç°ñ º¯ÇüÀÇ Ä¡·á¸¦ À§ÇÑ °ñ½ÅÀå¼úÀÇ ´Ù¾çÇÑ Àû¿ë¿¹

Various Application of Distraction Osteogenesis in Cleft Lip and Palate related Deformities

´ëÇѱ¸¼ø±¸°³¿­ÇÐȸÁö 2005³â 8±Ç 1È£ p.11 ~ 22
ÀÌÈ£, ¹é½ÂÇÐ, ÀÌÁ¾È£, ÃÖÁø¿µ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÈ£ ( Lee Ho ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
¹é½ÂÇР( Bek Seung-Hak ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú±³Á¤Çб³½Ç
ÀÌÁ¾È£ ( Lee Jong-Ho ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÃÖÁø¿µ ( Choi Jin-Young ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

»ó¾Ç°ñÀÇ ¿­¼ºÀå°ú ȾÀû ºÎÁ¶È­, ±×¸®°í ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ Ä¡Á¶¿­ ¹× ±¸°­»ó¾Çµ¿ ´©°øÀÇ Ä¡·á¿¡ À־ ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ºñÇØ °ñ½ÅÀå¼úÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´À» °æ¿ì, º» Áõ·Êµé°ú °ü·Ã ¹®Çå °íÂûÀ» ÅëÇÏ¿©, °ßÀη®ÀÇ ÃæºÐÇÑ È®º¸ ¹× ȸ±ÍÀ²ÀÇ ÃÖ¼ÒÈ­¸¦ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ¶ÇÇÑ ÀÔ¿ø°¡·á±â°£ÀÇ °¨¼Ò¿Í ¿¬Á¶Á÷ ºÎÁ¶È­ÀÇ ÇØ°áÀ» º¼ ¼ö ÀÖ¾î ±¸¼ø±¸°³¿­¿¡ °ü·ÃµÈ »ó¾Ç°ñ º¯ÇüÀÇ Ä¡·á¿¡ °ñ½ÅÀå¼úÀÌ À¯¿ëÇÑ Ä¡·á¹ýÀ̶ó »ý°¢µÇ¾î º¸°íÇÑ´Ù.

There ate anteroposterior$\cdot$vertical maxillary underdevelopment, transverse maxillary deficiency and wide cleft alveolus$\cdot$oroanual fistula among cleft lip ant palate related maxillary deformities. For treatment of these deformities, ones have used conventional treatment methods, there were often unsatisfactory results to patients and operators both. Since llizarov introduced effective technique of bone lengthening and augmentation for a variety of limb defotmities, application of distraction osteogenesis on maxillofacial area has been used to solve those disadvantages of conventional methods. Authors introduced following three cases about use of distraction osteogenesis. The first case is the application of RED(rigid external distraction) II system for the treatment of the anteroposterior$\cdot$vertical maxillary hypoplasia after several times of surgery and end of development in bilateral cleft lip and palate patient. The second case is the application of the USPD(unilateral segmental palatal distraction) for the resolution of the unilateral posterior crossbite and transverse dental arch asymmetry after alveolorraphy in growing unilateral cleft lip and palate patient. The third case is the application of transport distraction osteogenesis far closure of the wide clef alveolus and oroantral fistula in growing bilateral cleft lip and palate patient. There were satisfactory results in these cases. Particularly, in comparison with the decreases of relapse rates, the reduction of the hospitalization time and post-operative discomfort owing to minimal surgical intervention.

Å°¿öµå

Distraction osteogesis;LLP

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI